Imaginarios americanos. Civilizaciones y pluralidad en las múltiples Américas
Abstract
This article aims to rethink the perspective of multiple modernities and civilizations analysis
championed by SN Eisenstadt from the vantage point of the Americas. Using a notion of
social imaginaries (following Cornelius Castoriadis), I argue that there is a greater diversity
of multidimensional social formations than Eisenstadt accounted for. I draw on my previous
research in civilizational analysis and historical sociology to demonstrate that there are eleven
American regional constellations and societies and not simply two Americas, as Eisenstadt
suggests. To reach this conclusion, I point to the interconnections of societies and the
connected histories linking different regions over a very long period. The article explores
capitalism in the multiple Americas as an illustration of the argument.
References
ADAMS, Suzi y Jeremy Smith (eds.) (2019). Social Imaginaries: Critical Interventions. Londres: Rowman & Littlefield International.
ARJOMAND, Said Amir (ed.) (2014). Social Theory and Regional Studies in the Global Age, en Pangaea II: Global/Local Studies. Albany: Suny Press.
ARNASON, Johann P. (2003). Civilizations in Dispute: Historical Questions and Theoretical Traditions. Leiden-Boston: Brill.
ARNASON, Johann P. (2005). “The Varieties of Accumulation: Civilisational Perspectives on Capitalism”. En The Economy as Polity: The Political Constitution of Contemporary Capitalism, editado por Christian Joerges, Bo Strath y Peter Wagner, 17-36. Londres: University College of London Press.
ARNASON, Johann P. (2006). “Understanding Intercivilizational Encounters”, Thesis Eleven 86: 39-53.
ARNASON, Johann P. (2020). The Labyrinth of Modernity, editado por Suzi Adams y Jeremy C. A. Smith. Londres: Rowman & Littlefield.
BOLTANSKI, Luc y Eve Chiapello (2007). The New Spirit of Capitalism. Londres: Verso.
BURDICK, John, Philip Oxhorn y Kenneth M. Roberts (eds.) (2009). Beyond Neoliberalism in Latin America? Societies and Politics at the Crossroads. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
CASTLES, Stephen, Hein de Haas y Mark J. Miller (2014). The Age of Migration: International Population Movements in the Modern World, quinta edición. Nueva York: Guilford Press.
CASTORIADIS, Cornelius (1987 [1975]). The Imaginary Institution of Society. Cambridge, Reino Unido: Polity Press.
CASTORIADIS, Cornelius (2015). “The Imaginary as Such”, Social Imaginaries 1 (1): 59-65.
CHAMBERLAIN, Mary (1998). Caribbean Migration: Globalised Identities. Londres: Routledge.
DOMINGUES, José Mauricio (2008). Latin America and Contemporary Modernity: A Sociological Interpretation. Nueva York: Routledge.
EISENSTADT, S. N. (2000). “Multiple Modernities”, Daedalus 129: 1-30.
EISENSTADT, S. N. (2002). “Civilizations of the Americas: The Crystallization of Distinct Modernities”, Comparative Sociology 1 (1): 43-61.
EISENSTADT, S. N. (2013). “Latin America and the Problem of Multiple Modernities”. En Shifting Frontiers of Citizenship: The Latin American Experience, editado por Mario Sznajder, Luis Roniger y Carlos Forment, 43-54. Leiden: Brill.
FERNÁNDEZ-ARMESTO, Felipe (2003). The Americas: The History of a Hemisphere. Londres: Weidenfeld & Nicholson.
FERNÁNDEZ-ARMESTO, Felipe (2014). Our America: A Hispanic History of the United States. Nueva York: W. W. Norton & Co.
GARCÍA Canclini, Néstor (1997). Imaginarios urbanos. Buenos Aires: Eudeba.
HALL, P. y D. Soskice (2001). Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
JOERGES, Christian, Bo Stråth y Peter Wagner (eds.) (2005). The Economy as a Polity: The Political Constitution of Contemporary Capitalism. Londres: University College of London Press.
KATZENSTEIN, Peter J. (ed.) (2010a). Civilizations in World Politics: Plural and Pluralist Perspectives. Londres: Routledge.
KATZENSTEIN, Peter J. (2010b). “A World of Plural and Pluralist Civilizations; Multiple Actors, Traditions, and Practices”. En Civilizations in World Politics. Plural and Pluralist Perspectives, editado por Peter J. Katzenstein, 1-40. Londres: Routledge.
KNÖBL, Wolfgang (2006). “Of Contingencies and Breaks: The U.S. American South as an Anomaly in the Debate on Multiple Modernities”, Archives Européennes des Sociologie 47: 125–57.
LARRAÍN, Jorge (2000). Identity and Modernity in Latin America. Cambridge, Reino Unido: Polity.
LIPSET, Seymour Martin (1989). Continental Divide: The Values and Institutions of the United States and Canada. Washington, D. C.: Canadian American Committee.
MARTÍNEZ, Óscar J. (1994). Border People: Life and Society in the U.S.-Mexico Borderlands. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
MENNELL, Stephen (2007). The American Civilizing Process. Cambridge: Polity Press.
MILLER, Nicola (ed.) (2008). Reinventing Modernity in Latin America: Intellectuals Imagine the Future, 1900-1930. Nueva York: Palgrave Macmillan.
MOTA, Aurea y Gerard Delanty (2015). “Eisenstadt and the Multiple Modernities Framework: Revisions and Reconsiderations”, Journal of Classical Sociology 15 (1): 39-57.
MOTA, Aurea y Peter Wagner (2021). Collective Action and Political Transformations: The Entangled Experiences in Brazil, South Africa and Europe. Edinburgo: Edinburgh University Press.
PLOT, Martin y Ernesto Seman (2007). “Neither/Nor: Mapping Latin America’s Response to Neoliberalism and Neoconservatism”, Constellations 14 (3): 355-372.
PREBISCH, Raúl y Francisco Alburquerque Lloréns (1989). Raúl Prebisch. Madrid: Ediciones de Cultura Hispánica.
RIBEIRO, Darcy (1971). The Americas and Civilization. Nueva York: Dutton.
RICOEUR, Paul y George H. Taylor (1986). Lectures on Ideology and Utopia. Nueva York: Columbia University Press.
RONIGER, Luis (2011). Transnational Politics in Central America. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.
RONIGER, Luis y Mario Sznajder (eds.) (1998). Constructing Collective Identities and Shaping Public Spheres: Latin American Paths. Brighton, Inglaterra: Sussex Academic Press.
SIMMEL, Georg (1976). “The Metropolis and Mental Life”. En The Sociology of Georg Simmel, editado por Kurt H. Wolff. Nueva York: Free Press.
SMITH, Jeremy C. A. (2006). Europe and the Americas: State Formation, Capitalism and Civilizations in Atlantic Modernity. Leiden: Brill.
SMITH, Jeremy C. A. (2009). “Outside and against the Quincentenary: Modern Indigenous Representations at the Time of the Colombian Celebrations”, Atlantic Studies 6 (1): 63-80.
SMITH, Jeremy C. A. (2010). “The Many Americas: Civilization and Modernity in the Atlantic World”, European Journal of Social Theory 13 (1): 117-133.
SMITH, Jeremy C. A. (2017). Debating Civilisations: Interrogating Civilisational Analysis in a Global Age. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
SMITH, Jeremy C. A. (2022). American Imaginaries: Nations, Societies, and Capitalism in the Many Americas. Londres: Rowman & Littlefield.
SWEDBERG, Richard (2007). “Tocqueville and the Spirit of American Capitalism”. En On Capitalism, editado por Victor Nee y Richard Swedberg, 42-70. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
TAYLOR, Charles (2004). Modern Social Imaginaries. Durham: Duke University Press.
TOURAINE, Alain (1994). “Mutations of Latin America”, Thesis Eleven 38 (1): 61-71.
WAGNER, Peter (2012). Modernity: Understanding the Present. Cambridge: UK Polity Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Los autores/as que publiquen en esta revista aceptan las siguientes condiciones:
- Los autores/as conservan los derechos de autor y ceden a la revista el derecho de la primera publicación, con el trabajo registrado con la licencia de atribución de Creative Commons, que permite a terceros utilizar lo publicado siempre que mencionen la autoría del trabajo y a la primera publicación en esta revista.
- Los autores/as pueden realizar otros acuerdos contractuales independientes y adicionales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del artículo publicado en esta revista (p. ej., incluirlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro) siempre que indiquen claramente que el trabajo se publicó por primera vez en esta revista.
- Los derechos patrimoniales de la obra son transferidos de manera total y sin limitación alguna a la Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, por el tiempo que establezca la Ley Nacional e Internacional y sin prejuicio de respeto a los derechos de autoría moral.